Health · Weight
See your estimated ideal body weight from the four standard formulas, alongside the healthy BMI range for your height — a zone, not a single magic number.
Formulas are defined for adults 5 ft (152 cm) and taller; below that the base value is shown.
Healthy BMI range (18.5–24.9) for your height
129 lb – 174 lb
Formula average: 159 lb
Devine (1974)
161 lb
Robinson (1983)
157 lb
Miller (1983)
155 lb
Hamwi (1964)
165 lb
Devine (1974): The classic — still used for drug dosing.
Robinson (1983): A refinement of Devine.
Miller (1983): Tends to run a little higher for short heights.
Hamwi (1964): Common in clinical nutrition.
Enter sex and height
Choose US or metric units, then your sex and height.
Compare the four formulas
Devine, Robinson, Miller, and Hamwi each give a slightly different estimate — the spread is the point.
Anchor on the healthy range
Use the BMI 18.5–24.9 range as the evidence-based zone, and treat formula values as reference points inside or near it.
None of the four formulas on this page was invented to tell you what to weigh. Hamwi (1964) was a quick bedside rule for clinical nutrition; Devine (1974) was created to dose medications whose safe amounts scale with lean body size, and it remains embedded in pharmacology today; Robinson and Miller (both 1983) were statistical refinements once better population data existed. They share one structure — a base weight at 5 feet, plus a fixed amount per inch above it — which is why they agree reasonably well at average heights and fan out at the extremes. Understanding that lineage is the key to using them: they are clinical reference points, not aesthetic targets, and the spread between them is honest uncertainty, not a bug.
For a woman of 5′6″, the four formulas land at roughly 129–135 lb (58.7–61.3 kg) — Hamwi lowest, Miller highest, Devine and Robinson nearly identical at 131 lb. The healthy-BMI range for the same height is far wider: about 115–154 lb (52–70 kg). That comparison is the single most useful thing on this page. The formulas cluster in the lower-middle of the evidence-based band, so someone at 150 lb and 5′6″ is 15–20 lb “above ideal” by formula yet comfortably inside the range population studies associate with good health. For a man of 5′10″ the same pattern holds: formulas from 155 to 165 lb, with Hamwi highest for men and Miller lowest — the ordering flips between sexes because each author fitted different per-inch increments.
The practical reading order: start with the healthy-BMI range as the evidence-based zone (the BMI calculator shows where your current weight sits in it), use the formula cluster as a reference point within that zone, and let composition — not the scale — arbitrate the last few kilograms. If a change is warranted, the calorie calculator converts a target rate of loss or gain into a daily energy budget. A target zone of a few kilograms, approached at 0.25–0.45 kg a week, survives real life far better than a single magic number — and the difference between weighing 131 lb and 137 lb at 5′6″ is invisible to every health outcome that matters.
None is "correct" — all four are height-based estimates developed for clinical use (the Devine formula was designed for drug dosing, not aesthetics). Treat the spread across formulas, together with the healthy-BMI range, as a reasonable zone rather than a single target number.
These formulas only use height and sex. They ignore muscle mass, frame size, age, and body composition — a muscular person can be perfectly healthy well above every formula value. Body-fat percentage is a better lens for athletic builds.
It is the weight span that keeps your body mass index between 18.5 and 24.9 — the WHO "normal weight" band for adults. It is a population screening range, not an individual prescription.
No. They were derived for adults, and below 5 feet (152 cm) the per-inch adjustments stop being meaningful — this calculator falls back to the formula base value there. For children and teens, growth-chart percentiles are the right tool.
Each was fitted in a different era for a different purpose — Hamwi (1964) for quick clinical estimates, Devine (1974) for drug dosing, Robinson and Miller (1983) as statistical refinements. They all share the same structure (a base weight at 5 feet plus an amount per inch) but with different constants, so they fan out as height increases.
The formulas were designed as clinical reference weights and tend to sit in the lower half of the BMI 18.5–24.9 band, especially for taller people. Being above a formula value but inside the BMI range is not "overweight" by any medical definition.
Not on the strength of a height formula alone. If you are inside the healthy BMI range, composition (body-fat percentage, waist) says more than another kilogram either way; if you are outside it, pick a sustainable rate of change and a target zone rather than a single number.
Editorial Trust Panel
Author
Reviewed by
Health & Wellness Review Desk (Upaman)
Last reviewed
July 3, 2026
Content update
Auto-updated on Jun 28, 2026
Scope: Height-based population formulas (Devine 1974; Robinson 1983; Miller 1983; Hamwi 1964) and the WHO adult BMI range; none account for body composition or frame size.